wow, had no idea efilism has so many unhinged members, thanks for the research and effort. But what is your personal thought on efilism itself as a philosophy? Does it have any good arguments at all? Is the efilist conclusion to erase all of life by force, to permanently stop harm, a defensible one?
P1 Suffering and the cause of suffering (DNA are products of a wasteful, failed, and undesigned experiment.
P2 Humans have the capacity to manufacture an exit strategy for life.
C Humans have a responsibility to manufacture an exit strategy for life.
The conclusion isn't justified by the reasoning.
However this doesn't mean the conclusion can't be justified. It may be possible to formulate argumentation that justifies the conclusion, but I haven't seen it.
2: Does it have any good arguments at all?
I'm not sure what this means. I don't think there's any such thing as an efilist argument per se, except for the above syllogism. Sure, efilists typically have a pessimistic or misanthropic view of existence, but these aren't original or unique to efilism. Do you have any specific examples of arguments that are uniquely efilist?
1: What is your personal thought on efilism itself as a philosophy?
wow, had no idea efilism has so many unhinged members, thanks for the research and effort. But what is your personal thought on efilism itself as a philosophy? Does it have any good arguments at all? Is the efilist conclusion to erase all of life by force, to permanently stop harm, a defensible one?
Thank you for your questions. I'll answer them in reverse order.
3: Is the efilist conclusion to erase all of life by force, to permanently stop harm, a defensible one?
The efilism argument [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcBm_XOitZM&t=1666s] can be summed up as:
P1 Suffering and the cause of suffering (DNA are products of a wasteful, failed, and undesigned experiment.
P2 Humans have the capacity to manufacture an exit strategy for life.
C Humans have a responsibility to manufacture an exit strategy for life.
The conclusion isn't justified by the reasoning.
However this doesn't mean the conclusion can't be justified. It may be possible to formulate argumentation that justifies the conclusion, but I haven't seen it.
2: Does it have any good arguments at all?
I'm not sure what this means. I don't think there's any such thing as an efilist argument per se, except for the above syllogism. Sure, efilists typically have a pessimistic or misanthropic view of existence, but these aren't original or unique to efilism. Do you have any specific examples of arguments that are uniquely efilist?
1: What is your personal thought on efilism itself as a philosophy?
Efilism is vaporware [https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxwmyZz0WdpqAQRvk3vrhOdMgcQ0tqHaQV]